Cricket faternity question Pakistan’s stance on boycotting the match against India at T20 World Cup 2026
- Laiba Abbasi
- Feb 2
- 3 min read

Pakistan’s decision not to play against India at the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2026 has sparked strong reactions from former international cricketers, with questions raised over consistency and the broader implications for global tournaments.
A former India international took to social media to highlight what he described as a contradiction, pointing out that Pakistan’s decision was announced on a day when the two teams were already competing against each other in an ICC event calling it peer-level hypocrisy by Pakistan. The remark quickly gained traction online, triggering widespread debate among fans across both countries.

Meanwhile, a former England captain also weighed in, questioning how the situation would unfold if India and Pakistan were to meet in the latter stages of the tournament. He asked whether Pakistan would refuse to participate should the two sides be drawn to face each other in a World Cup final, underlining the potential complications such a stance could create for tournament integrity.

The comments come in the aftermath of an official statement by the Government of Pakistan, which confirmed that while the national team has been cleared to participate in the T20 World Cup 2026, it will not take the field in the group-stage match scheduled against India on 15 February 2026.

Former Pakistan all‑rounder Mohammad Hafeez spoke out on Twitter, saying the whole situation started with a no-handshake incident from Team India. He warned that this isn’t a good sign for cricket fans anywhere.
Hafeez didn’t blame anyone directly. Instead, he expressed worry over the sport losing its spirit. “We grew up waiting for this clash. Cricket is meant to bring people together, not create more tension,” he wrote.
Fans are divided online. Some feel the boycott was necessary, while others are upset that politics are overshadowing the game. Either way, the biggest game in world cricket this year won’t be played, and Hafeez fears it’s a loss for everyone who loves cricket.

Veteran cricket commentator Harsha Bhogle has warned that Pakistan’s decision to boycott its scheduled match against India at the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2026 could have significant financial repercussions — particularly for the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB).
In a widely shared social media post, Bhogle said he “would not be surprised” if the International Cricket Council (ICC) asks the PCB to compensate broadcasters and sponsors for revenue losses incurred as a result of Pakistan’s absence from the high‑profile fixture. Given the traditional viewership and commercial value of an India–Pakistan clash, Bhogle argued that any loss faced by broadcasters and partners might be deducted from Pakistan’s share of ICC revenue.
“The match against India is one of the biggest commercially in world cricket,” Bhogle wrote. “If Pakistan opts out, the financial impact on broadcasters will be huge — and it’s reasonable to expect the ICC to protect those interests.”
Bhogle also raised questions about how Pakistan would respond if the two teams were to face off later in the tournament, for example in a playoff or final match scenario. “What will Pakistan’s stance be if the tournament structure brings them up against India later?” he asked, highlighting potential complications beyond the group stage.
Other former players and pundits have also weighed in, questioning how Pakistan’s stance might affect the tournament’s narrative and commercial appeal, given that India–Pakistan matches are traditionally among the most watched in world sport. Several analysts have pointed out that while Pakistan will compete in the rest of its group fixtures, the absence of a scheduled match against India could have logistical and financial consequences for the ICC and broadcasters alike.
With the Pakistan Cricket Board yet to provide additional clarification and the ICC engaged in consultations with member boards, further commentary from cricketing figures is expected as the situation develops in the lead-up to the World Cup’s opening matches.




Comments